Cason v. State
This text of 22 Ark. 214 (Cason v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This was an indictment for retailing spirituous liquors contrary to the statute. The appellant pleaded in abatement, and upon his plea an issue of fact was made up and submitted to the court for trial, sitting as a jury. The court found the issue for the State, and fined the appellant twenty-five dollars, for which, with costs, final judgment was rendered. This, according to the decision of this court in Cooper vs. The State, 21 Ark. 228, and the authorities there cited, was erroneous. The issue of fact should have been tried by jury, and not by the court. Let the judgment be reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 Ark. 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cason-v-state-ark-1860.