Cason v. State
This text of 131 So. 915 (Cason v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment in this case is affirmed on the authority of Mars v. State (6 Div. 633) 23 Ala. App. 569, 129 So. 314, and Wilkerson v. State (6 Div. 634) 23 Ala. App. 520, 128 So. 777, both Ala. App., which settle the question of the sufficiency of the indictment.
The other question presented on the court’s ruling refusing to permit defendant to testify as to his declaration, when he left home is without merit.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
131 So. 915, 24 Ala. App. 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cason-v-state-alactapp-1930.