Cason v. State
131 So. 915, 24 Ala. App. 620
Opinion
The judgment in this case is affirmed on the authority of Mars v. State (6 Div. 633) 23 Ala. App. 569, 129 So. 314, and Wilkerson v. State (6 Div. 634) 23 Ala. App. 520, 128 So. 777, both Ala. App., which settle the question of the sufficiency of the indictment.
The other question presented on the court’s ruling refusing to permit defendant to testify as to his declaration, when he left home is without merit.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cason v. State, 131 So. 915, 24 Ala. App. 620 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).
131 So. 915 (Cason v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilkerson v. State
128 So. 777 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1930)
Mars v. State
129 So. 314 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1930)