Cason v. Holder

Fourth Circuit

Cason v. Holder

464 F. App'x 131

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 13, 2012

DocketNo. 11-2134

StatusPublished

This text of 464 F. App'x 131 (Cason v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cason v. Holder, 464 F. App'x 131 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ishia Cason appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint challenging the seizure of a vehicle subject to forfeiture. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cason v. Holder, No. 1:11-cv-01304-ELH, 2011 WL 4537861 (D.Md. Sept. 27, 2011). We deny Cason’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Ishia Cason appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint challenging the seizure of a vehicle subject to forfeiture. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cason v. Holder, No. 1:11-cv-01304-ELH, 2011 WL 4537861 (D.Md. Sept. 27, 2011). We deny Cason’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

464 F. App'x 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cason-v-holder-ca4-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack