Caso v. 323 Edgecombe Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Caso v. 323 Edgecombe Realty Corp.

25 A.D.2d 637, 267 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4771

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1966

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 25 A.D.2d 637 (Caso v. 323 Edgecombe Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caso v. 323 Edgecombe Realty Corp., 25 A.D.2d 637, 267 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4771 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on October 19, 1965, settling the accounts of Samuel S. Goodman, the Receiver herein, overruling the objections of the plaintiffs to the account and directing payment to the receiver of commissions and an additional allowance of $1,250, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, by deleting from the order the paragraph awarding to the receiver an allow[638]*638anee for additional services in the sum of $1,250, and otherwise affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellants. CPLR 8004 (suhd. [a]) provides for the maximum compensation to be paid a receiver computed at 5% of sum received and disbursed by the receiver. The statutory commissions represent the maximum amount which may be paid to a receiver for his services. (Siegel v. Bromanbro Really Corp., 23 A D 2d 634.)

Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Steuer and Staley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on October 19, 1965, settling the accounts of Samuel S. Goodman, the Receiver herein, overruling the objections of the plaintiffs to the account and directing payment to the receiver of commissions and an additional allowance of $1,250, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, by deleting from the order the paragraph awarding to the receiver an allow[638]*638anee for additional services in the sum of $1,250, and otherwise affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellants. CPLR 8004 (suhd. [a]) provides for the maximum compensation to be paid a receiver computed at 5% of sum received and disbursed by the receiver. The statutory commissions represent the maximum amount which may be paid to a receiver for his services. (Siegel v. Bromanbro Really Corp., 23 A D 2d 634.)

Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Steuer and Staley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 637, 267 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caso-v-323-edgecombe-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack