Casius v. United States
Opinion
USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ DOC #: aol CASIUS ERNEST, DATE FILED:__// [iz/ 2026 Petiti ; a 16-CV-4848 (KMW) -against- 12-CR-442 (KMW) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. nnn ren eon ee none □□□ en enn cece ene ene KX KIMBA M. WOOD, United States District Judge: On June 22, 2016, Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On September 9, 2016, at the request of the parties, the Court stayed this proceeding pending the final disposition of United States v. Elvin Hill, 890 F.3d 51 (2d Cir. 2018). On December 11, 2018, at the request of Petitioner and with the Government’s consent, the Court continued the stay pending final disposition of United States v. Barrett, 903 F.3d 166 (2d Cir. 2018), cert. granted, judgment vacated, 139 S. Ct. 2774 (2019), and abrogated by United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019). On February 7, 2019, the Court continued the stay pending the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Davis, 139 8, Ct. 2319 (2019). The Supreme Court issued an opinion in Davis on June 24, 2019. The parties are ordered to update the Court by November 30, 2020, indicating how they wish to proceed with respect to Mr. Ernest’s Section 2255 petition.
SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York November 12, 2020 } lacalt WK, wae KIMBA M. WOOD United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Casius v. United States (Casius v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.