Casimir Eme-Odunze v. State
This text of Casimir Eme-Odunze v. State (Casimir Eme-Odunze v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order filed, November 11, 2014.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-14-00601-CR ____________
CASIMIR EME-ODUNZE, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No 6 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1878875
ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due October 20, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On August 18, 2014, this court granted Patricia Palmer’s first motion for extension of time to file the record until September 18, 2014. On September 17, 2014, Patricia Palmer filed a second motion for extension of time to file the record which was granted until October 20, 2014. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.
We order Patricia Palmer, the substitute court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. No further extension will be entertained absent exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Patricia Palmer does not timely file the record as ordered, we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the record.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Casimir Eme-Odunze v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casimir-eme-odunze-v-state-texapp-2014.