CASHUS D. CUMMINGS vs STATE OF FLORIDA

• Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
• Decided: February 3, 2023
• Docket: 22-2335
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

CASHUS D. CUMMINGS,

Appellant, Case No. 5D22-2335 v. LT Case No. 2010-CF-00032

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed February 3, 2023

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County, R. Lee Smith, Judge.

Cashus D. Cummings, Crestview, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Due to Appellant’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive,

repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment and

sentence in St. Johns County, Seventh Judicial Circuit Case No. 2010-CF-

00032, this Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer,

751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the response

and finding it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we

conclude that Appellant is abusing the judicial process and should be barred

from further pro se filings.

In order to conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited from

filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning St. Johns County,

Seventh Judicial Circuit Case No. 2010-CF-00032. The Clerk of this Court

is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced

case unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See

Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is

enough.”). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this

opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary

proceedings. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019); Simpkins v. State, 909 So.

2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

APPELLANT PROHIBITED FROM ANY FURTHER PRO SE FILINGS.

LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.