Cash's Appeal

1 Pa. 166
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 15, 1845
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 Pa. 166 (Cash's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cash's Appeal, 1 Pa. 166 (Pa. 1845).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The money ought, in truth, to have been awarded to the judgment of Green; but, as he has not appealed, nothing can be,done for him here. The question was between Myer and Green, in the court below, to the one or the other of whom the money certainly belonged, and Cash had no colour of claim to it. His argument,that the judgment in the feigned issue between Myer and Green threw the latter out of the battle, and left it to be waged by Myer, who had clearly no right, is unsound. A judgment is an estoppel only between parties or privies; never in favour of a stranger. As the only appeal taken has actually failed, the decree is left to stand as it was rendered in the court below.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Chester Housing Authority
327 A.2d 335 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
Pa. HR Comm. v. Chester Hous. Auth.
458 Pa. 67 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
Hesselman v. Somerset Community Hospital
201 A.2d 302 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Pa. 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cashs-appeal-pa-1845.