Cashmere & Camel v. Saks Fifth Avenue

284 F.3d 302
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided May 22, 2002·No. 00-2341·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 00-2341

CASHMERE & CAMEL HAIR MANUFACTURERS INSTITUTE, F/K/A CAMEL HAIR & CASHMERE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, INC., AND L.W. PACKARD & CO., INC.,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

SAKS FIFTH AVENUE,

HARVE BENARD, LTD. AND FILENES BASEMENT,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on April 1, 2002, is amended as follows:

On page 28, line 2: Insert a one-sentence paragraph that reads:

"Nothing in this opinion, however, is meant to preclude defendants from rebutting the presumption of consumer deception at trial by showing that the labeling did not actually deceive consumers."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cashmere & Camel v. Saks Fifth Avenue, 284 F.3d 302 (1st Cir. 2002).

284 F.3d 302 (Cashmere & Camel v. Saks Fifth Avenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MMM Healthcare, Inc. v. MCS Health Management Options
818 F. Supp. 2d 439 (D. Puerto Rico, 2011)