Cashmere & Camel v. Saks Fifth Avenue

First Circuit

Cashmere & Camel v. Saks Fifth Avenue

284 F.3d 302

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedMay 22, 2002

Docket00-2341

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 284 F.3d 302 (Cashmere & Camel v. Saks Fifth Avenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cashmere & Camel v. Saks Fifth Avenue, 284 F.3d 302 (1st Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 00-2341

CASHMERE & CAMEL HAIR MANUFACTURERS INSTITUTE, F/K/A CAMEL HAIR & CASHMERE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, INC., AND L.W. PACKARD & CO., INC.,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, HARVE BENARD, LTD. AND FILENES BASEMENT,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on April 1, 2002, is amended as follows:

On page 28, line 2: Insert a one-sentence paragraph that reads:

"Nothing in this opinion, however, is meant to preclude defendants from rebutting the presumption of consumer deception at trial by showing that the labeling did not actually deceive consumers."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI