Cashman v. Bama Janitor Service, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Cashman v. Bama Janitor Service, Inc.

415 So. 2d 1, 1982 Ala. LEXIS 3224

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 4, 1982·No. 81-246·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because this case, involving a noncompet-ition agreement, had been tried and was pending on appeal prior to the release of this Court’s opinion in DeVoe v. Cheatham, 413 So.2d 1141 (Ala.1982), this cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of the guidelines set forth in DeVoe, supra. Upon the trial court’s reconsideration (with or without a further evidentiary hearing, at its discretion), a report of its findings and order is due in this Court not later than 60 days from the date of the order of remand.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because this case, involving a noncompet-ition agreement, had been tried and was pending on appeal prior to the release of this Court’s opinion in DeVoe v. Cheatham, 413 So.2d 1141 (Ala.1982), this cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of the guidelines set forth in DeVoe, supra. Upon the trial court’s reconsideration (with or without a further evidentiary hearing, at its discretion), a report of its findings and order is due in this Court not later than 60 days from the date of the order of remand.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Cashman v. Bama Janitor Service, Inc., 415 So. 2d 1, 1982 Ala. LEXIS 3224 (Ala. 1982).

Pincite

415 So. 2d 1 (Cashman v. Bama Janitor Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related