Cashion
This text of 157 Ct. Cl. 942 (Cashion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Civilian pay; dismissal; laches. — This case came before the court on plaintiff’s and defendant’s motions for summary [943]*943judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto and oral argument of counsel, the court, on May 18,1962, concluded, on the basis of U.S. ex rel. Arant v. Lane, 249 U.S. 367, and Bailey v. United States, 144 Ct. Cl. 720, that plaintiff’s alleged claim is barred by laches, and ordered that the petition be dismissed. Plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court, 371 U.S. 895.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 Ct. Cl. 942, 1962 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 132, 1962 WL 1590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cashion-cc-1962.