Cashin v. City of New Rochelle
This text of 231 A.D. 734 (Cashin v. City of New Rochelle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Rich, Kapper and Scudder, JJ., [735]*735concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., dissent upon the ground that the proof of damage is vague and the measure of that damage improper, and upon the further ground that the cause of action as to the mound rested in contract, does not belong to plaintiff and is barred by the Statute of Limitations.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 A.D. 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cashin-v-city-of-new-rochelle-nyappdiv-1930.