Cash v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cash v. State

581 S.E.2d 726, 261 Ga. App. 98, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1485, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 553

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 2, 2003

DocketA01A2371

StatusPublished

This text of 581 S.E.2d 726 (Cash v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cash v. State, 581 S.E.2d 726, 261 Ga. App. 98, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1485, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 553 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Johnson, Presiding Judge.

Relying upon our holding in Culver v. State,1 we decided in this case that venue in a Medicaid fraud case brought pursuant to OCGA § 49-4-146.1 (b) (1) (C) was proper in the county in which the defendant submitted and the state processed the fraudulent claims.²

In State v. Kell,3 the Supreme Court reversed the decisions in Culver and Cash, holding that prosecutions for Medicaid fraud cases brought under OCGA § 49-4-146.1 (b) (1) (C) may be brought in any county in which an act in furtherance-of the crime took place. Thus, venue was proper not only in the county in which the claims were processed, but also in the county in which the fraudulent documentation was generated.

Accordingly, our decision in Division 2 of Cash v. State is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court, and the judgment of the trial court as to venue is affirmed. Our decision as to Division 1, sufficiency of the evidence, is not affected.

Judgment affirmed.

Ruffin, P. J., and Ellington, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson, Presiding Judge.

Relying upon our holding in Culver v. State,1 we decided in this case that venue in a Medicaid fraud case brought pursuant to OCGA § 49-4-146.1 (b) (1) (C) was proper in the county in which the defendant submitted and the state processed the fraudulent claims.²

In State v. Kell,3 the Supreme Court reversed the decisions in Culver and Cash, holding that prosecutions for Medicaid fraud cases brought under OCGA § 49-4-146.1 (b) (1) (C) may be brought in any county in which an act in furtherance-of the crime took place. Thus, venue was proper not only in the county in which the claims were processed, but also in the county in which the fraudulent documentation was generated.

Accordingly, our decision in Division 2 of Cash v. State is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court, and the judgment of the trial court as to venue is affirmed. Our decision as to Division 1, sufficiency of the evidence, is not affected.

Judgment affirmed.

Ruffin, P. J., and Ellington, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

581 S.E.2d 726, 261 Ga. App. 98, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1485, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cash-v-state-gactapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack