Cash v. State

581 S.E.2d 726, 261 Ga. App. 98, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1485, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 553
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cash v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 254 Ga. App. 718
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 2, 2003·No. A01A2371·Published

Opinion

Johnson, Presiding Judge.

Relying upon our holding in Culver v. State,1 we decided in this case that venue in a Medicaid fraud case brought pursuant to OCGA § 49-4-146.1 (b) (1) (C) was proper in the county in which the defendant submitted and the state processed the fraudulent claims.2

In State v. Kell,3 the Supreme Court reversed the decisions in Culver and Cash, holding that prosecutions for Medicaid fraud cases brought under OCGA § 49-4-146.1 (b) (1) (C) may be brought in any county in which an act in furtherance-of the crime took place. Thus, venue was proper not only in the county in which the claims were processed, but also in the county in which the fraudulent documentation was generated.

Accordingly, our decision in Division 2 of Cash v. State is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court, and the judgment of the trial court as to venue is affirmed. Our decision as to Division 1, sufficiency of the evidence, is not affected.

Judgment affirmed.

Ruffin, P. J., and Ellington, J., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cash v. State, 581 S.E.2d 726, 261 Ga. App. 98, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1485, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 553 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003).

581 S.E.2d 726 (Cash v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Kell
577 S.E.2d 551 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)
Culver v. State
562 S.E.2d 201 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)
Cash v. State
563 S.E.2d 459 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)