Cash v. State
This text of 979 So. 2d 1028 (Cash v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Darryl CASH, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Darryl Cash, in proper person.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, CORTIÑAS, and SALTER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Darryl Cash appeals a circuit court order denying his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The order was entered following an evidentiary hearing. The detailed findings of fact in the order are supported by competent substantial evidence, and we therefore defer to those findings. McLin v. State, 827 So.2d 948, 954 n. 4 (Fla.2002).
The circuit court's well-reasoned order is also correct in its analysis of each of Cash's three claims. After affording deference to the trial court's factual findings, we agree with the trial court's order that Cash has failed to demonstrate that his counsel was ineffective under the standards set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
979 So. 2d 1028, 2008 WL 583682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cash-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.