Cash v. State

779 So. 2d 425, 2000 WL 1504924
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 11, 2000
Docket2D98-4594
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 779 So. 2d 425 (Cash v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cash v. State, 779 So. 2d 425, 2000 WL 1504924 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

779 So.2d 425 (2000)

Jacob CASH, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D98-4594.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 11, 2000.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Robert F. Moeller, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Diana K. Bock, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

DAVIS, Judge.

Jacob Cash challenges his conviction and sentence on charges of second-degree murder (count I) and shooting at, within, or into an occupied vehicle (count II). We find no merit in Cash's claims regarding his conviction and only address the challenge to his sentence. The trial court sentenced Cash to fifty years' incarceration on count I. He argues that this sentence improperly exceeds the guidelines range. We agree and reverse his sentence as to count I and remand for resentencing.

Cash scored 375.6 points on his sentencing guidelines scoresheet, putting him in a sentencing range of 260.7 to 434.5 months' imprisonment. Section 921.0014(2), Florida Statutes (1997), provides, "If the total sentence points are equal to or greater than 363, the court may sentence the offender to life imprisonment." The trial court (and the assistant state attorney) misunderstood this provision to allow a sentence of years up to life. However, by a strict reading of the statutory language, this provision allows only a guidelines sentence or a life sentence.

Because this sentence exceeded the guidelines but was not a life sentence, the trial court was required to give written reasons justifying the departure. See § 921.001(6), Fla. Stat. (1997). The trial court failed to provide written reasons. Accordingly, we reverse the sentence as to count I and remand for resentencing. See Culver v. State, 727 So.2d 278 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Reversed and remanded.

PARKER, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. State
126 So. 3d 436 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Byrd v. State
841 So. 2d 502 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Willis v. State
785 So. 2d 648 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
779 So. 2d 425, 2000 WL 1504924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cash-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.