Cash v. State

596 So. 2d 746, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3849, 1992 WL 59223
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 27, 1992·No. No. 91-1157·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his conviction for sexual battery on a person less than twelve years of age by a person eighteen years or older. Appellant argues, among other things, that section 90.803(23), Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional both on its face and as applied. Appellant observes that this statute was upheld as constitutional in Perez v. State, 536 So.2d 206 (Fla.1988), and Glendening v. State, 536 So.2d 212 (Fla.1988), but he asserts that the more recent decision in Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805, 110 S.Ct. 3139, 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990) undermines the result reached in Perez and Glendening. We disagree.

We find further that none of the other issues raised by appellant merit reversal. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, WIGGINTON and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cash v. State, 596 So. 2d 746, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3849, 1992 WL 59223 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

596 So. 2d 746 (Cash v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cinkat Transp., Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
596 So. 2d 746 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)