Cash v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cash v. State

474 So. 2d 425, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 21765

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 28, 1985·No. No. BD-173·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Cash appeals from the imposition of sentence following violation and revocation of probation. His appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that he can make no good faith argument that error occurred in the trial court. Although Cash was given permission to file a pro se brief, he did not do so. A thorough review of the record by this court reveals no reversible error.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, C.J., and JOANOS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MILLS, Judge.

Cash appeals from the imposition of sentence following violation and revocation of probation. His appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that he can make no good faith argument that error occurred in the trial court. Although Cash was given permission to file a pro se brief, he did not do so. A thorough review of the record by this court reveals no reversible error.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, C.J., and JOANOS, J., concur.

Cash v. State, 474 So. 2d 425, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 21765 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

474 So. 2d 425 (Cash v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related