Cash v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cash v. State

474 So. 2d 425, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 21765

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 28, 1985

DocketNo. BD-173

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 474 So. 2d 425 (Cash v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cash v. State, 474 So. 2d 425, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 21765 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Cash appeals from the imposition of sentence following violation and revocation of probation. His appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that he can make no good faith argument that error occurred in the trial court. Although Cash was given permission to file a pro se brief, he did not do so. A thorough review of the record by this court reveals no reversible error.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, C.J., and JOANOS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MILLS, Judge.

Cash appeals from the imposition of sentence following violation and revocation of probation. His appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that he can make no good faith argument that error occurred in the trial court. Although Cash was given permission to file a pro se brief, he did not do so. A thorough review of the record by this court reveals no reversible error.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, C.J., and JOANOS, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

474 So. 2d 425, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 21765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cash-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack