Cash v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cash v. State

412 So. 2d 420, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19809

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 13, 1982

DocketNos. 81-2664 to 81-2667

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 412 So. 2d 420 (Cash v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cash v. State, 412 So. 2d 420, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19809 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

When a petitioner alleges ineffective assistance of counsel, unless the motion and the files and records in the case conclusively show that he is not entitled to relief, the petitioner is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his Rule 3.850 motion. Meeks v. State, 382 So.2d 673 (Fla.1980); see Brown v. State, 404 So.2d 157 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

Reversed and remanded for evidentiary, hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

When a petitioner alleges ineffective assistance of counsel, unless the motion and the files and records in the case conclusively show that he is not entitled to relief, the petitioner is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his Rule 3.850 motion. Meeks v. State, 382 So.2d 673 (Fla.1980); see Brown v. State, 404 So.2d 157 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

Reversed and remanded for evidentiary, hearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

412 So. 2d 420, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cash-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack