Cash v. State Board of Pardons & Paroles

765 S.W.2d 4, 297 Ark. 625, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 57
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided February 13, 1989·No. 88-298·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Jerry Cash, appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, has petitioned this court to order the State of Arkansas to reproduce the appellant’s abstract and brief on appeal. This case is civil in nature and there is no duty on the part of the state to provide a civil litigant with special materials, assistance, or printing. We held held a number of times that such things will be granted in a civil case only upon a showing of substantial merit. Patterson v. Smith, 289 Ark. 564, 712 S.W.2d 922 (1986); Williams v. State, 289 Ark. 567, 712 S.W.2d 924 (1986); Hayes v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 419, 706 S.W.2d 179 (1986); Glick v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 417, 706 S.W.2d 178 (1986).

No such showing has been made in this case and the motion, •therefore, is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Purtle, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cash v. State Board of Pardons & Paroles, 765 S.W.2d 4, 297 Ark. 625, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 57 (Ark. 1989).

765 S.W.2d 4 (Cash v. State Board of Pardons & Paroles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Le v. Nguyen
379 S.W.3d 573 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2010)
Slaton v. Jones
195 S.W.3d 392 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2004)
Hatchett v. Terry
190 S.W.3d 302 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2004)