Cash v. Peyton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Cash v. Peyton

136 S.E. 163, 163 Ga. 370, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 82

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 18, 1926·No. No. 5517·Published

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. The verdict is supported by evidence.

2. Construing tbe charge as a whole, there was no material error; nor can the language employed be said to have misled the jury, though the language in several excerpts upon which error is assigned can be properly subjected to verbal criticism.

3. The grounds of the motion which complain of the admission of evidence do not show error. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

1. The verdict is supported by evidence.

2. Construing tbe charge as a whole, there was no material error; nor can the language employed be said to have misled the jury, though the language in several excerpts upon which error is assigned can be properly subjected to verbal criticism.

3. The grounds of the motion which complain of the admission of evidence do not show error. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cash v. Peyton, 136 S.E. 163, 163 Ga. 370, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 82 (Ga. 1926).

Pincite

136 S.E. 163 (Cash v. Peyton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.