Cash v. Huff

Fourth Circuit

Cash v. Huff

142 F.2d 60, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3254

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 12, 1944

DocketNo. 5236

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 142 F.2d 60 (Cash v. Huff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cash v. Huff, 142 F.2d 60, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3254 (4th Cir. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a writ of habeas corpus and remanding the prisoner to custody. Petitioner was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. He asks to be released on writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the trial court received in evidence against him on his trial a confession which he contends was extorted from him in violation of his rights as laid down in the case of McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332, 63 S.Ct. 608, 87 L.Ed. 819, which was an appeal from a convicr tion in a criminal case. There was no showing of any such gross violation of constitutional right as would deny the prisoner the substance of a fair trial and thus oust the court of jurisdiction to impose sentence. What we have is nothing more than an attempt by habeas corpus to review the proceedings had on the trial. This the prisoner may not do. The judgment appealed from will be affirmed on the authority of Eury v. Huff, 4 Cir., 141 F.2d 554; Sanderlin v. Smyth, 4 Cir., 138 F.2d 729; Burall v. Johnson, 9 Cir., 134 F.2d 614, certiorari denied 319 U.S. 768, 63 S.Ct. 1327, 87 L.Ed. 1717, rehearing denied 320 U.S. 810, 64 S.Ct. 30; and Graham v. [61]*61Squier, 9 Cir., 132 F.2d 681, certiorari denied Graham v. Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, 318 U.S. 777, 63 S.Ct. 830.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a writ of habeas corpus and remanding the prisoner to custody. Petitioner was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. He asks to be released on writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the trial court received in evidence against him on his trial a confession which he contends was extorted from him in violation of his rights as laid down in the case of McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332, 63 S.Ct. 608, 87 L.Ed. 819, which was an appeal from a convicr tion in a criminal case. There was no showing of any such gross violation of constitutional right as would deny the prisoner the substance of a fair trial and thus oust the court of jurisdiction to impose sentence. What we have is nothing more than an attempt by habeas corpus to review the proceedings had on the trial. This the prisoner may not do. The judgment appealed from will be affirmed on the authority of Eury v. Huff, 4 Cir., 141 F.2d 554; Sanderlin v. Smyth, 4 Cir., 138 F.2d 729; Burall v. Johnson, 9 Cir., 134 F.2d 614, certiorari denied 319 U.S. 768, 63 S.Ct. 1327, 87 L.Ed. 1717, rehearing denied 320 U.S. 810, 64 S.Ct. 30; and Graham v. [61]*61Squier, 9 Cir., 132 F.2d 681, certiorari denied Graham v. Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, 318 U.S. 777, 63 S.Ct. 830.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

142 F.2d 60, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cash-v-huff-ca4-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack