Casey v. Wernikoff
This text of 29 A.D.2d 685 (Casey v. Wernikoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 1, 1967, as denied a motion for summary judgment, dismissing the complaint, insofar as the motion was made by appellant. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs, and motion as to appellant remanded to the Special Term for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. A hearing should be held, at which the process server may be cross-examined, as to whether he had exercised due diligence in attempting to effectuate personal service of the summons and complaint upon appellant. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 A.D.2d 685, 287 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casey-v-wernikoff-nyappdiv-1968.