Casey v. Vanderlande Industries, Inc.

Sixth Circuit

Casey v. Vanderlande Industries, Inc.

200 F. App'x 462

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 5, 2006·No. Nos. 05-6654, 05-6655·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David and Wendy Casey appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Williams Union Boiler and Cives Steel Company. The panel having reviewed the record and the applicable law, and having the benefit of oral argument and the parties’ briefs, we determine that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirm the district court’s decision for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

David and Wendy Casey appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Williams Union Boiler and Cives Steel Company. The panel having reviewed the record and the applicable law, and having the benefit of oral argument and the parties’ briefs, we determine that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirm the district court’s decision for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion.

Casey v. Vanderlande Industries, Inc., 200 F. App'x 462 (6th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

200 F. App'x 462 (Casey v. Vanderlande Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.