Casey v. Supreme Court of Appeals

West Virginia Court of Claims

Casey v. Supreme Court of Appeals

22 Ct. Cl. 34

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedJanuary 9, 1998

DocketCC-97-188

StatusPublished

This text of 22 Ct. Cl. 34 (Casey v. Supreme Court of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Casey v. Supreme Court of Appeals, 22 Ct. Cl. 34 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks payment in the amount of $297.00 for serving as a Special Family Law Master in Mason County. The respondent failed to receive the necessary documentation in the proper fiscal year; therefore, the claimant has not been paid. Respondent, in its Answer, admits the validity of the claim, but states that there were insufficient funds in its appropriation for the fiscal year in question from which to pay the claim.

While the Court believes that this is a claim which in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision [35]*35in Airkem Sales and Service, et al. vs. Dept. of Mental Health, 8 Ct.Cl. 180 (1971).

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI