Casey v. Supreme Court of Appeals
This text of 21 Ct. Cl. 186 (Casey v. Supreme Court of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Answer.
Claimant seeks $341.00 for serving as a Special Family Law Master for the respondent. The documentation for these services was not received by the respondent in the proper fiscal year; therefore, the claimant has not been paid. In its Answer, the respondent admits the validity of the claim, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year with which the claim could have been paid.
In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award in the amount of $341.00.
Award of $341.00.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 Ct. Cl. 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casey-v-supreme-court-of-appeals-wvctcl-1997.