Casey v. Sterling Cider Co.

First Circuit

Casey v. Sterling Cider Co.

15 F.2d 52, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2817

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedOctober 27, 1926

DocketNo. 1623

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 F.2d 52 (Casey v. Sterling Cider Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Casey v. Sterling Cider Co., 15 F.2d 52, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2817 (1st Cir. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

BINGHAM, Circuit Judge.

On December 21, 1923, this court entered an order affirming the judgment of the District Court in the above-entitled case; said judgment having been rendered in favor of the Sterling Cider Company, and the government having prosecuted a writ of error to this court.

The Sterling Cider Company now (at the October term, 1926) presents a motion asking that we recall our mandate and amend the order by adding thereto the words “with interest.” The government objects to this.

As the term at which the order of December 21, 1923, was entered has long since expired, and the. modification desired would involve a matter of substance, and not of mere form, we are without power to make the modification, and the motion must be denied. Schell v. Dodge, 107 U. S. 629, 2 S. Ct. 830, 27 L. Ed. 601; E. G. Staude Mfg. Co. v. Labombarde, 247 F. 879, 160 C. C. A. 101.

The motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI