Casey v. State
This text of 1968 OK CR 66 (Casey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case the appellant seeks a reversal of his conviction, rendered in the district court of Pittsburg County, Oklahoma, wherein he was charged with “obtaining money by means of deception and false and fraudulent representations and pretenses, second and subsequent offense.” Defendant was tried before a jury, found guilty, and his punishment fixed at five years in the state penitentiary. Appeal was duly perfected to this Court.
Counsel for defendant has filed a brief in support of the many assignments of error about which he complains, citing authorities in support thereof.
[209]*209This case was set for oral argument and assignment on March 6, 1968. At that time the Attorney General expressed doubt as to whether or not the State could defend this record, because of the obvious errors, and he has not submitted a brief. This is tantamount to a confession of error.
When the Attorney General confesses error, this Court will carefully examine the record for fundamental error. In the case at bar the Court concurs in the views expressed by the Attorney General, and the judgment and sentence is reversed, and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1968 OK CR 66, 440 P.2d 208, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casey-v-state-oklacrimapp-1968.