Casey v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided October 21, 2024·No. 22-1483V·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 22-1483V

TERRY CASEY, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: September 18, 2024 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Richard Christian Macke, R. Christian Macke, Newport, KY, for Petitioner.

Dorian Hurley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

On October 11, 2022, Terry Casey filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) or, in the alternative, a recurring right upper arm abscess, resulting from an influenza (“flu”) vaccine received on October 10, 2019. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed September 18, 2024, at ¶¶ 2-4. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was administered in the United States, she has experienced residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and neither Petitioner, nor any other party, has ever filed any action or received compensation in the form of an award or settlement for her vaccine- related injury. Petition at ¶¶ 2, 30-32; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury, recurring right upper arm abscess, or any other injury; denies that petitioner suffered the residual effects of her alleged injury for more than six months; and

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). denies that petitioner’s current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

Nevertheless, on September 18, 2024, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $40,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE U~ITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

TERRY CASEY,

Petitioner, No. 22-1483V Chief Special Master Corcoran V. ECF

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.

Respondent.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

I . Terry Casey ("petitioner") filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly rdated to petitioner's receipt

of an inf1uenza ("flu") vaccine. which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the

"Table"). 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received a flu vaccine on October 10, 20 l 9.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that petitioner suffered a shoulder i11ju1y related to vaccine

administration ("SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the Table. In the alternative,

petitioner alleges that petitioner suffered a recutTing righi upper amt abscess at the right deltoid

site of vaccination that was caused-in-fact by the flu vaccine and resulted in muscle necrosis.

Petitioner further alleges that petitioner suffered the residual effects of the alleged inju1y for

more than six months. 5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on petitioner's behalf as a result of the alleged injury.

6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the t1u

vaccine caused petitioner's alleged shoulder injury, recurring right upper arm abscess, or any

other injury; denies that petitioner suffered the residual effects of her alleged inju1y for more

than six months; and denies that petitioner's CUlTent condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related

InJUry.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2 I (a)(l ), the Secreta1y of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $40,000.00 in the fonn of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entiy of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-21 (a)( I), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this

petition.

l 0. Petitioner and petitioner's attorney represent that compensation to be provided

pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Casey v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

Casey v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Casey v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-2
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(I)
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
§ 300aa-l5
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l5(a)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a