Casey v. Schwitter
This text of 272 A.D.2d 910 (Casey v. Schwitter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to impress a trust, order denying plaintiffs’ motion to vacate a dismissal, under rule 17 of the Kings County Supreme Court Rules, and to restore the action to the calendar, the motion having been made four years after the action was marked off the trial calendar, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Adel, Nolan and Sneed, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 A.D.2d 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casey-v-schwitter-nyappdiv-1947.