Casey v. Ruffino

807 N.E.2d 888, 1 N.Y.3d 563, 775 N.Y.S.2d 776, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 4165
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 23, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 807 N.E.2d 888 (Casey v. Ruffino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Casey v. Ruffino, 807 N.E.2d 888, 1 N.Y.3d 563, 775 N.Y.S.2d 776, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 4165 (N.Y. 2003).

Opinion

Appeal by nonparty appellant Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, EC., dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the Appellate Division did not have the power to grant leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals on a certified question from an order granting a new hearing (see CPLR 5601 [c]; 5602 [b] [1]; Maynard v Greenberg, 82 NY2d 913). This dismissal is without prejudice to nonparty appellant taking any further action that may be available (see CPLR 5514 [a]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

EDEN ROC HOTEL, LTD. v. Gilbert
807 N.E.2d 889 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
807 N.E.2d 888, 1 N.Y.3d 563, 775 N.Y.S.2d 776, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 4165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casey-v-ruffino-ny-2003.