Casey v. Ruffino

807 N.E.2d 888, 1 N.Y.3d 563, 775 N.Y.S.2d 776, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 4165
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 23, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by nonparty appellant Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, EC., dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the Appellate Division did not have the power to grant leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals on a certified question from an order granting a new hearing (see CPLR 5601 [c]; 5602 [b] [1]; Maynard v Greenberg, 82 NY2d 913). This dismissal is without prejudice to nonparty appellant taking any further action that may be available (see CPLR 5514 [a]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Casey v. Ruffino, 807 N.E.2d 888, 1 N.Y.3d 563, 775 N.Y.S.2d 776, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 4165 (N.Y. 2003).

807 N.E.2d 888 (Casey v. Ruffino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

EDEN ROC HOTEL, LTD. v. Gilbert
807 N.E.2d 889 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)