Casey v. Ross

178 N.E.2d 429, 10 N.Y.2d 834
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 1961·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment reversed and complaint dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. No opinion.

[836] Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster. Judge Dye dissents and votes to affirm upon the ground that under the circumstances here present the issues of defendants’ negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence presented questions of fact which were properly left to the trial court for its determination. The court’s finding in favor of plaintiff on those issues, having been affirmed by the Appellate Division, is conclusive (Mayer v. Temple Props., 307 N. Y. 559; Le Roux v. State of New York, 307 N. Y. 397; Schuvart v. Werner, 291 N. Y. 32).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Casey v. Ross, 178 N.E.2d 429, 10 N.Y.2d 834 (N.Y. 1961).

178 N.E.2d 429 (Casey v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jarrett v. Madifari
67 A.D.2d 396 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)