Casey v. Murray
99 N.E.2d 426, 229 Ind. 545, 1951 Ind. LEXIS 189
Opinion
This is an original action whereby petitioner seeks an alternative writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to hear and determine an alleged petition for writ of error coram nobis hied by the relator in the trial court. Since the action is not brought in the name of the State of Indiana on the relation of the petitioner, the issuance of the alternative writ is denied upon the authority of Meek v. Baker (1951), 229 Ind. 543, 99 N. E. 2d 426, decided this date.
Note.-—Reported in 99 N. E. 2d 426.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Casey v. Murray, 99 N.E.2d 426, 229 Ind. 545, 1951 Ind. LEXIS 189 (Ind. 1951).
99 N.E.2d 426 (Casey v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pitts v. Mills
333 N.E.2d 897 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1975)
Supreme Court ex rel. Demoss v. Daviess Circuit Court
183 N.E.2d 607 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1962)
State Election Board v. Johnson Circuit Court
180 N.E.2d 540 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1962)
Roberts v. BYRD, JUDGE OF WELLS CIRCUIT COURT
143 N.E.2d 568 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1957)
Jackson v. State, Reeves, Judge
134 N.E.2d 551 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1956)
White v. Washington County Circuit Court
132 N.E.2d 702 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1956)
Hayes v. SCOTT COUNTY CT., ETC.
128 N.E.2d 872 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1955)
Meek v. Baker
99 N.E.2d 426 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1951)