Casey v. Murray
This text of 99 N.E.2d 426 (Casey v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an original action whereby petitioner seeks an alternative writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to hear and determine an alleged petition for writ of error coram nobis hied by the relator in the trial court. Since the action is not brought in the name of the State of Indiana on the relation of the petitioner, the issuance of the alternative writ is denied upon the authority of Meek v. Baker (1951), 229 Ind. 543, 99 N. E. 2d 426, decided this date.
Note.-—Reported in 99 N. E. 2d 426.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 N.E.2d 426, 229 Ind. 545, 1951 Ind. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casey-v-murray-ind-1951.