Casey v. International Harvester Co. of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Casey v. International Harvester Co. of America

241 A.D. 643

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 241 A.D. 643 (Casey v. International Harvester Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Casey v. International Harvester Co. of America, 241 A.D. 643 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, with ten dollars costs to the appellant against the State Industrial Board. Claimant’s attorney is a party in interest who may appeal under section 23 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (See Rawlings v. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Kentucky, 187 Ky. 308; 218 S. W. 985; Schilling v. Industrial Accident Commission of California, 47 Cal. App. 190; 190 Pac. 373.) McNamee, Bliss and Heflernan, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., and Rhodes, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, with ten dollars costs to the appellant against the State Industrial Board. Claimant’s attorney is a party in interest who may appeal under section 23 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (See Rawlings v. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Kentucky, 187 Ky. 308; 218 S. W. 985; Schilling v. Industrial Accident Commission of California, 47 Cal. App. 190; 190 Pac. 373.) McNamee, Bliss and Heflernan, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., and Rhodes, J., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D. 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casey-v-international-harvester-co-of-america-nyappdiv-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack