Casey v. HASTINGS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
722 N.W.2d 822, 477 Mich. 917
Opinion
Howard CASEY and Connie Legg, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
HASTINGS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 20, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are *823 not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Casey v. HASTINGS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 722 N.W.2d 822, 477 Mich. 917 (Mich. 2006).
722 N.W.2d 822 (Casey v. HASTINGS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.