Casey v. General Motors, LLC

District Court, S.D. California·Decided September 17, 2020·No. 3:20-cv-00299·Unknown

Opinion

REBECCA CASEY, individually, Case No.: 20-cv-299-WQH-MSB and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, ORDER Plaintiff, v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, Defendant. HAYES, Judge: On February 18, 2020, Plaintiff Rebecca Casey filed a Complaint against Defendant General Motors, LLC. (ECF No. 1). On July 31, 2020, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 11). On August 6, 2020, the Court issued an Order that stated, “The deadline for Plaintiff to file her opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or file an amended Complaint, if any, is extended to September 15, 2020.” (ECF No. 13 at 1). On September 15, 2020, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 14). Once filed, an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint in its entirety. Ramirez v. Cty. of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015). Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, addressing the original Complaint, became moot once Plaintiff filed Amended Complaint. Jd. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (ECF No. 11) 1s denied as moot. Dated: September 17, 2020 BME: ie Z. A a Hon. William Q. Hayes g United States District Court 1]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Casey v. General Motors, LLC, (S.D. Cal. 2020).

Casey v. General Motors, LLC (Casey v. General Motors, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sergio Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino
806 F.3d 1002 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)