Casey v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 * * *
4 TIMOTHY CASEY, Case No. 2:18-cv-00546-EJY
5 Plaintiff,
6 v. ORDER
7 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 8 Defendant. 9 10 Before the Court is Counsel’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to 11 42 U.S.C. § 406(B). ECF No. 40. No response to this motion was filed by Defendant. Therefore, 12 Counsel’s Motion is unopposed. 13 Counsel seeks an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §406(b) in the amount of 14 $17,874.00. ECF No. 40 at 2. Counsel further asks the Court to order reimbursement to Plaintiff 15 Timothy Casey in the amount of $4,200.00, an amount already paid in fees under the Equal Access 16 to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. 2412. Id. Counsel obtained a decision from the Court remanding 17 Plaintiff’s case for payment of benefits, which includes approximately $71,499.52 in retroactive 18 benefits. The $17,874.00 in fees requested is for 23.1 hours of work and is 25% of the net payable 19 past due benefits to Plaintiff. Looking to the character of the representation and the results obtained, 20 the fee award is reasonable. See 42 U.S.C. § 406(b); Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789 (2002). 21 Plaintiff prepared a complaint, briefed a reply, ultimately obtained an award in Plaintiff’s favor, and 22 approached this case in a manner that saved time and reduced the accumulation of past due benefits. 23 Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1152 (9th Cir. 2009). The Court also notes that Plaintiff agreed 24 to the award of 25% of past due benefits at the outset of this case and has not objected to the pending 25 Motion. 26 As stated in Gisbrecht, “Congress harmonized fees payable by the Government under EAJA 27 with fees payable under § 406(b) out of the claimant’s past-due Social Security benefits in this 1 ‘refun[d] to the claimant the amount of the smaller fee.’ Act of Aug. 5, 1985, Pub.L. 99–80, § 3, 99 2 Stat. 186. Thus, an EAJA award offsets an award under Section 406(b), so that the amount of the 3 total past-due benefits the claimant actually receives will be increased by the ... EAJA award up to 4 the point the claimant receives 100 percent of the past-due benefits.” 535 at 796 (internal citation 5 and alteration omitted). The Court therefore orders Counsel to reimburse Plaintiff in the amount of 6 $4,200.00 of previously paid EAJA fees. 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Counsel’s Notice of Motion and Motion for 8 Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(B) (ECF No. 40) is GRANTED. 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security is directed to certify 10 the fee of $17,874.00 payable to the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing. 11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counsel, through the Law Offices of Lawrence D. 12 Rohlfing, shall refund $4,200.00 to Plaintiff. 13 Dated this 12th day of January, 2021.
15 ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH 16 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Casey v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (Casey v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.