Casey v. Clowers

Michigan Supreme Court

Casey v. Clowers

711 N.W.2d 369, 474 Mich. 1095

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided March 27, 2006·No. 130024·Published

Opinion

711 N.W.2d 369 (2006) 474 Mich. 1095

Edno Dino CASEY, III, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Brian L. CLOWERS, Defendant-Appellant, and
DAH Trucking Company, Inc., and City of Detroit, Defendants.

Docket No. 130024, COA No. 262142.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 27, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 27, 2005 *370 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

711 N.W.2d 369 (2006) 474 Mich. 1095

Edno Dino CASEY, III, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Brian L. CLOWERS, Defendant-Appellant, and
DAH Trucking Company, Inc., and City of Detroit, Defendants.

Docket No. 130024, COA No. 262142.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 27, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 27, 2005 *370 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Casey v. Clowers, 711 N.W.2d 369, 474 Mich. 1095 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

711 N.W.2d 369 (Casey v. Clowers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Edno Dino CASEY, III, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian L. CLOWERS, Defendant-Appellant, and DAH Trucking Company, Inc., and City of Detroit, Defendants.

Edno Dino CASEY, III, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Brian L. CLOWERS, Defendant-Appellant, and
DAH Trucking Company, Inc., and City of Detroit, Defendants.