Casey v. Brelsford
This text of 2 Miles 174 (Casey v. Brelsford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As to so much of this application as relates to the defendant entering security for stay of execution for a part of the amount of the judgment, we have no authority to interfere, as none is granted by the acts of assembly. (See Stroud’s Puri, lit. Execution.) As to entering judgment de bonis for another part of the amount of the judgment, the court have settled that to be inadmissible.
Rule discharged.
See Dorr v. McClintock, in this volume.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Miles 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casey-v-brelsford-pactcomplphilad-1838.