Casey v. Barry

City of New York Municipal Court

Casey v. Barry

27 Misc. 835, 60 N.Y.S. 768

DecidedMay 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 27 Misc. 835 (Casey v. Barry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Casey v. Barry, 27 Misc. 835, 60 N.Y.S. 768 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

McCarthy, J.

Ro,exception or other objection was taken in this case but the.one in regard to the comment of counsel in the summing up.

We have examined the record very carefully and do not find that there was any application addressed to the court to pass upon this question.

Besides, we think there was enough evidence in the case to allow the comment objected to by respondent’s' attorney.

The ease was fairly and impartially tried and no reversible error was committed.

' Judgment is, therefore,, affirmed, with costs.

Hascall, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI