Casey v. AUTO OWNERS INS. CO.
711 N.W.2d 737, 474 Mich. 1086
This text of 711 N.W.2d 737 (Casey v. AUTO OWNERS INS. CO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Casey v. AUTO OWNERS INS. CO., 711 N.W.2d 737, 474 Mich. 1086 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Everett CASEY and Maryalice Casey, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Homeowners Insurance Company, Asu Group, and Meredith Reschly, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. *738 The application for leave to appeal the March 1, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
711 N.W.2d 737, 474 Mich. 1086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casey-v-auto-owners-ins-co-mich-2006.