Casey, R. v. Xpedx
This text of Casey, R. v. Xpedx (Casey, R. v. Xpedx) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
ROBERT CASEY : No. 104 EAL 2020 : : v. : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court : XPEDX, XPEDX, VERITIV, VERITIV : CORPORATION, FORD MOTOR : COMPANY AND FORD : : : PETITION OF: FORD MOTOR COMPANY :
ROBERT CASEY : No. 122 EAL 2020 : : v. : Cross Petition for Allowance of : Appeal from the Order of the : Superior Court XPEDX, XPEDX, VERITIV, VERITIV : CORPORATION, FORD MOTOR : COMPANY AND FORD : : : PETITION OF: XPEDX, XPEDX, VERITIV, : AND VERITIV CORPORATION :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 1st day of September, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Casey, R. v. Xpedx, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casey-r-v-xpedx-pa-2020.