Casey Myers v. Luis Jose Molla, Etc.
This text of Casey Myers v. Luis Jose Molla, Etc. (Casey Myers v. Luis Jose Molla, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed October 2, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-2093 Lower Tribunal No. 23-16594 ________________
Casey Myers, Appellant,
vs.
Luis Jose Molla, etc., et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Barbara Areces, Judge.
Casey Myers, in proper person.
Lapin & Leichtling, LLP, and Justin G. Prociv, for appellees.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
“In appellate proceedings the decision of a trial court has the
presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error.” Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d
1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979). On the record before us, we find no reversible error
and affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Casey Myers v. Luis Jose Molla, Etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casey-myers-v-luis-jose-molla-etc-fladistctapp-2024.