Casey G. Dobbs v. Shawn Ballew and Brent Warden

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 15, 2021
Docket07-21-00108-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Casey G. Dobbs v. Shawn Ballew and Brent Warden (Casey G. Dobbs v. Shawn Ballew and Brent Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Casey G. Dobbs v. Shawn Ballew and Brent Warden, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-21-00108-CV

CASEY G. DOBBS, APPELLANT

V.

SHAWN BALLEW AND BRENT WARDEN, APPELLEES

On Appeal from the County Court Oldham County, Texas Trial Court No. 772, Honorable David L. Gleason, Presiding

June 15, 2021 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.

Appellant Casey G. Dobbs, a Texas inmate proceeding pro se, filed a notice of

appeal from the trial court’s Order of Dismissal without paying the required filing fee.1 By

letter of May 14, 2021, we directed Dobbs to pay the filing fee or, in lieu thereof, to comply

1 Dobbs filed a notice of appeal within fifteen days after the notice of appeal deadline. By letter of

May 17, 2021, we notified Dobbs that a motion for an extension of time was implied and directed him to provide a reasonable explanation for his late notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997); Jones v. City of Houston, 976 S.W.2d 676, 677 (Tex. 1998). Because Dobbs has filed a response reasonably explaining the delay, an extension of time to file the late notice of appeal is granted. with chapter 14 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code by filing 1) an affidavit of

indigence, 2) an affidavit relating to previous filings, and 3) a certified copy of his inmate

trust account statement. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 14.002(a), 14.004

(West 2017). We advised Dobbs that this appeal was subject to dismissal if he did not

comply by May 24, 2021. Dobbs has filed an affidavit of indigence but has not filed an

affidavit describing his previous filings or a certified copy of his inmate trust account

statement to date.

The requirement to pay the filing fee or tender an affidavit of indigence, an affidavit

of previous filings, and a certified copy of an inmate trust account statement is mandatory,

and the lack thereof is grounds for dismissal of an appeal or original proceeding. See In

re Denson, No. 07-20-00191-CV, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 6966, at *1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo

Aug. 27, 2020, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.). Because Dobbs has failed to

pay the filing fee or comply with all the requirements of chapter 14 of the Civil Practice

and Remedies Code within the time provided for compliance, we dismiss his appeal.

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)
Jones v. City of Houston
976 S.W.2d 676 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Casey G. Dobbs v. Shawn Ballew and Brent Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casey-g-dobbs-v-shawn-ballew-and-brent-warden-texapp-2021.