Casey ex rel. Hanson v. Casey

Missouri Court of Appeals

Casey ex rel. Hanson v. Casey

214 S.W.3d 352, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 262, 2007 WL 447227

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 2007·No. No. ED 88167·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nicolas Casey appeals the judgment and order granting a motion for directed verdict in favor of Michael Casey, Michael Bocquillon, John Bamvakais and Matthew Tornetto. We find that the court did not err in finding that the plaintiff did not present a submissible case of wrongful death against any of the defendants. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment of the trial court under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nicolas Casey appeals the judgment and order granting a motion for directed verdict in favor of Michael Casey, Michael Bocquillon, John Bamvakais and Matthew Tornetto. We find that the court did not err in finding that the plaintiff did not present a submissible case of wrongful death against any of the defendants. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment of the trial court under Rule 84.16(b).

Casey ex rel. Hanson v. Casey, 214 S.W.3d 352, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 262, 2007 WL 447227 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

214 S.W.3d 352 (Casey ex rel. Hanson v. Casey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.