Casey Brent Sutterfield v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Casey Brent Sutterfield v. State

DecidedMarch 28, 2013

Docket11-12-00152-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Casey Brent Sutterfield v. State (Casey Brent Sutterfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Casey Brent Sutterfield v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

Casey Brent Sutterfield, * From the 266th District Court of Erath County, Trial Court No. CR13558.

Vs. No. 11-12-00152-CR * March 28, 2013

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

Casey Brent Sutterfield, * From the 266th District Court of Erath County, Trial Court No. CR13558.

Vs. No. 11-12-00152-CR * March 28, 2013

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Casey Brent Sutterfield v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casey-brent-sutterfield-v-state-texapp-2013.