Casey Austin Jones v. State
This text of Casey Austin Jones v. State (Casey Austin Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-15-00113-CR
CASEY AUSTIN JONES, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 71st District Court Harrison County, Texas Trial Court No. 12-0154X
Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. ORDER
Our review of the clerk’s record and volumes one, five, six, seven, and nine of the reporter’s
record, including defense exhibit one and State’s exhibits two and six, in this case indicates that
these records contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home
address, and the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.”
TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10 (a)(1)-(3). The aforementioned records include the name of a person who
was a minor at the time the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders
otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices,
must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).
Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper
form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the
clerk’s record and volumes one, five, six, seven, and nine of the reporter’s record, including
defense exhibit one and State’s exhibits two and six, contain sensitive data, we order the clerk of
this Court, or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s
record and volumes one, five, six, seven, and nine, including defense exhibit one and State’s
exhibits two and six, of the electronically filed reporter’s record in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: May 18, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Casey Austin Jones v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casey-austin-jones-v-state-texapp-2016.