Casentini v. Schneider Bros.
This text of 27 S.W. 883 (Casentini v. Schneider Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the court below in this case will be affirmed.
1. Plaintiff’s right to proceed under the statute was not barred by lapse of time.
2. All the proceedings show that the motion or complaint was made in the case of Schneider Bros. v. Giozza, and although the complaint purports to have been made by George Schneider & Co., a firm composed of Charles Schneider, the judgment was rendered in favor of the right parties. The name of plaintiffs given in the motion will be treated as a misnomer. 1 Black on Judg., sec. 213; Kronski v. Railway, 77 Mo., 369.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 S.W. 883, 8 Tex. Civ. App. 108, 1894 Tex. App. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casentini-v-schneider-bros-texapp-1894.