Casement v. Soliant Health, Inc.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 JAMES CASEMENT, Case No.: 1:19-cv-01262 DAD JLT
12 Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION AS TO RIGHTSOURCING, INC. 13 v.
14 SOLIANT HEALTH INC, et al.,
Defendants. 15
16 17 The plaintiff has filed a notice of dismissal as to Rightsourcing, Inc. (Doc. 18) Though 18 Rightsourcing joined in the notice of removal to this Court, it has not filed an answer or a motion for 19 summary judgment. (Doc. 10) Thus, according to Fed. R. Civ.P. 41(a)(ii), the dismissal is effective 20 without an order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 21 Therefore, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this action as to Rightsourcing, Inc. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED.
24 Dated: November 12, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25
27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Casement v. Soliant Health, Inc. (Casement v. Soliant Health, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.