Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Casebolt v. Courtney

Casebolt v. Courtney

162 S.W. 1045, 177 Mo. App. 414, 1914 Mo. App. LEXIS 82
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 19, 1914
StatusPublished

This text of 162 S.W. 1045 (Casebolt v. Courtney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Casebolt v. Courtney, 162 S.W. 1045, 177 Mo. App. 414, 1914 Mo. App. LEXIS 82 (Mo. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

ROBERTSON, P. J.

This action is in the nature of a suit to redeem real estate in Jasper county and [415]*415to have the title thereto divested out of the defendant and vested in the plaintiff, clearly involving ,as is conceded by the parties hereto, title to real estate and governed by onr decision in the case of House v. Clark, 171 Mo. App. 242, 156 S. W. 495. It is, therefore, transferred to the Supreme Court.

Farrington and Sturgis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

House v. Clarke
156 S.W. 495 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 S.W. 1045, 177 Mo. App. 414, 1914 Mo. App. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casebolt-v-courtney-moctapp-1914.