Casebolt v. Courtney

Missouri Court of Appeals

Casebolt v. Courtney

162 S.W. 1045, 177 Mo. App. 414, 1914 Mo. App. LEXIS 82

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 19, 1914·Published

Opinion

ROBERTSON, P. J.

This action is in the nature of a suit to redeem real estate in Jasper county and [415] to have the title thereto divested out of the defendant and vested in the plaintiff, clearly involving ,as is conceded by the parties hereto, title to real estate and governed by onr decision in the case of House v. Clark, 171 Mo. App. 242, 156 S. W. 495. It is, therefore, transferred to the Supreme Court.

Farrington and Sturgis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROBERTSON, P. J.

This action is in the nature of a suit to redeem real estate in Jasper county and [415] to have the title thereto divested out of the defendant and vested in the plaintiff, clearly involving ,as is conceded by the parties hereto, title to real estate and governed by onr decision in the case of House v. Clark, 171 Mo. App. 242, 156 S. W. 495. It is, therefore, transferred to the Supreme Court.

Farrington and Sturgis, JJ., concur.

Casebolt v. Courtney, 162 S.W. 1045, 177 Mo. App. 414, 1914 Mo. App. LEXIS 82 (Mo. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

162 S.W. 1045 (Casebolt v. Courtney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related