Casebeer v. Hudspeth

Supreme Court

Casebeer v. Hudspeth

312 U.S. 662, 61 S. Ct. 804

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Casebeer v. Hudspeth. Read the opinion of the Court — 316 U.S. 683 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 17, 1941·No. No. 631·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is. [663]*663granted, the petition for writ of certiorari is also granted, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals with directions to reconsider the petitioner’s appeal in the light of a transcript of the testimony taken at the hearing on the petition for habeas corpus.

Edward Casebeer, pro se.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is. [663]*663granted, the petition for writ of certiorari is also granted, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals with directions to reconsider the petitioner’s appeal in the light of a transcript of the testimony taken at the hearing on the petition for habeas corpus.

Edward Casebeer, pro se.

Casebeer v. Hudspeth, 312 U.S. 662, 61 S. Ct. 804 (1941).

Pincite

312 U.S. 662 (Casebeer v. Hudspeth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.