Casebeer v. Hudspeth

Supreme Court

Casebeer v. Hudspeth

312 U.S. 662, 61 S. Ct. 804

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 17, 1941

DocketNo. 631

StatusPublished

This text of 312 U.S. 662 (Casebeer v. Hudspeth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Casebeer v. Hudspeth, 312 U.S. 662, 61 S. Ct. 804 (1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is. [663]*663granted, the petition for writ of certiorari is also granted, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals with directions to reconsider the petitioner’s appeal in the light of a transcript of the testimony taken at the hearing on the petition for habeas corpus.

Edward Casebeer, pro se.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is. [663]*663granted, the petition for writ of certiorari is also granted, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals with directions to reconsider the petitioner’s appeal in the light of a transcript of the testimony taken at the hearing on the petition for habeas corpus.

Edward Casebeer, pro se.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

312 U.S. 662, 61 S. Ct. 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casebeer-v-hudspeth-scotus-1941.